My democratic choice for this November 27: I have made up my mind for whom not to vote
Nipawin - October 26, 2000 - by: Mario deSantis
despicable economic policies	We have been uncovering the misdeeds of our Premier Romonaw's 'no-faultland.' The
	'no-faultland' was an extended attribute Timothy Shire placed on our government when
	after so many despicable economic policies he realized that even human rights were being
	violated in Saskatchewan(1) . And when Premier Romanow announced his intention to leave
	his premiership, our Prime Minister Jean Chrétien hailed him as a great Canadian and friend
	and felt disappointed that Premier Romanow would not run as a Liberal for the upcoming
	election.
own self-interests	Mr. Romanow and Mr. Chrétien are for sure friends, and as friends they share what is most
	at heart in today's political arena: pure correlated corruption. They are both two statistical
	speculators who use their smartness not on behalf of the electorate but on behalf of their
	own self-interests and against the electorate. Last year, Premier Romanow called a provincial
	election when the pre electoral opinion polls showed an assured victory over the Saskatchewan
	Party; but as the results came out Romanow received a surprise and his NDP Party didn't get
	the majority of the votes.
textured corrupted environment	Today, Prime Minister Chrétien has called an election prematurely for the simple reason that
	recent opinion polls show his Liberal Party to lead by an astronomic margin over any other
	party. Again, let us hope that Mr. Chrétien will have a surprise, just the same or worse as
	Premier Romanow got last year. As we all should know by now, the Liberal Party has created
	a textured corrupted environment and Canada has become a mockery of democracy.
three Western provinces combined	After reading the article "All together now: Get out of my way!(2)" I am convinced that we
	must go to the polls and vote against Jean Chrétien. That is, we have reached a level of
	democracy whereby we don't have to vote for the party reflecting our values, but we must
	now vote for any party but Mr. Chrétien's Liberal. We must vote all together now so that
	Mr. Chrétien gets out of our way! The article by Mark Steyn is sarcastic and humorous and
	while I hope you have the time to read it, I am going to pass along this salient excerpt:
	"If the government chooses to build lavish golf resorts in Gander, that's a matter of spending priorities, and, if other parties disagree, then they should formulate their own golf policies. Likewise, if it were the case that one Quebec riding were getting more funding than three Western provinces combined, that might just be a particularly extreme example of targeted investment. But, when the riding in question happens to be the Prime Minister's, that's corrupt. When projects in that riding are pre-approved before the application's been put in, that's corrupt. When the Auditor-General issues a report on it and a Parliamentary committee is prevented from questioning him because the ruling party's placemen sabotage the meeting, that's piling corruption upon corruption."
arrogant mule	And, if the above excerpt didn't convince you for whom not to vote, then refer to what Alan
	Stanley has said:
	"I am disgusted with everything Mr. Chrétien stands for and everything he does. He is an arrogant mule who won the last two elections by default, the first as an anti-Mulroney protest vote and the second as a beneficiary of a split right-wing vote. This man and his party are an Ontario government that believes it has a national mandate(3)."
made up my mind	I didn't make up my mind yet for whom to vote, but I have made up my mind for whom not
	to vote, did you?
---------References/Endnotes:
	List of articles by Mario deSantis
1.	No-faultland, by Timothy Shire, July 4, 2000
2.	All together now: Get out of my way! By Mark Steyn, October 23, 2000, National Post
3.	And they're off, by Alan Stanley, letter of October 21, 2000, National Post