The assembly line economics is obsolete |
|
Nipawin - December 30, 2000 - by: Mario deSantis | |
common language |
We have been focusing on the social changes brought by the New Economy, and we have |
been explaining the undergoing state of confusion we are experiencing in every facet of our | |
daily life. This state of confusion is ubiquitous among all of us, and in one way, this state of | |
confusion is rooted in our inability to speak a common language, a language which allows us | |
to understand each other, to prioritize our common concerns, and grow more intelligently | |
individually and collectively. | |
|
|
knowledge |
Today, we don't speak a common language, and as long as we measure our social and |
economic growth in accordance to traditional assembly line economics, we are doomed to | |
have a divided society. The assembly line economics should be re-dimensioned, and we must | |
stop teaching it in our educational institutions. The law of demand and supply characterizing | |
the so called market economy is not existent anymore, because corporations have become | |
bigger and bigger, because governments are serving these big corporations, and conceptually | |
because knowledge is becoming the fundamental economic driver of our social growth, and | |
therefore there is never an over abundance of knowledge! | |
|
|
regressive society |
In a knowledge economy, knowledge is not subject to the law of demand and supply, it is only |
in a regressive society that we find that knowledge is the inner sanctum of the few and | |
privileged! And it is only in a regressive society that we must choose between growth of | |
GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for the few and privileged or a more equitable distribution of | |
wealth. And it is only in a regressive society that we find the externalization of pollution costs | |
caused by the big corporations. | |
|
|
obsolete |
Assembly line economics is obsolete, and as long as we don't change our way of thinking |
and don't realize that there is much more to the GDP to make our lives happier, we will | |
continue to have a divided society and divided world. | |
-----------------Notes/References: | |
Quote by Donella Meadows "challenging a paradigm is not a part-time job. It is not sufficient to make your point once and then blame the world for not getting it. The world has a vested interest in, a commitment to, not getting it. The point has to be made patiently and repeatedly, day after day after day" ftp://sysdyn.mit.edu/ftp/sdep/Roadmaps/RM1/D-4143-1.pdf The Global Citizen, http://www.tidepool.org/gc/ | |
List of relevant social articles http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign | |
INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, by Thomas Stewart, Currency Doubleday, 1997 | |
TRYING TO GRASP THE INTANGIBLE: The assets that really count are the ones accountants can't count--yet. Here's one way to put a dollar value on corporate knowledge, by Thomas Stewart. | |
ECONOMIC MYTHS, Excerpt from "When Corporations Rule the World" by David C. Korten, Kumarian Press and Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1995 | |
New Rules for the New Economy. Twelve dependable principles for thriving in a turbulent world. By Kevin Kelly, Executive Editor, Wired Magazine Group Inc., F E A T U R E S | Issue 5.09 - September 1997 |